Monday, August 27, 2018

Thuggery at Cosmos Bank - Queries raised on the eve of AGM (27/08/2018)


Written queries sent to the Board of Directors of Cosmos Co-operative Bank Limited posted in public interest and specifically for the information of Shareholders as well as Depositors.

August 27, 2018


Mr. Milind Kale
Chairman
The Cosmos Co-operative Bank Limited
Cosmos Tower
Plot No-6, S.No-132/B, ICS Colony
Ganeshkhind Road
Pune – 411007                                                        E-mail: milind.kale@cosmosbank.in

Sir,

Sub:   Queries in terms of Note 3 pertaining to the accounts of the bank covered by Item No. 2(A) of the AGM agenda – regarding.

Please refer to Notice dated 10/08/2018 calling for the AGM of the bank on 02/09/2018. Item No. 2(A) is adoption of the accounts. Note 3 appended to the said notice provide that members should submit their queries relating to the business to be transacted in the said AGM on or before 30/08/2018.

In terms of Note No. 3, I am submitting my queries to relating to the accounts covered by Item No. 2(A) of the agenda of the AGM.

I have been asking you about various cases of quick NPAs and Still Born NPAs. However, you have steadfastly neglected and/or failed to provide me any information. Many more such NPA cases are under my study from peripheral angle. As you have demonstratively failed to explain those accounts, and as I see a resolute reluctance and defiance on your part to furnish the same from my meetings with yourself, Ex-MD Mr. Vikrant Ponkshe, Group Chairman Dr. Mukund Abhyankar and Director Mr. Krishnakumar Goyal, I have already compiled a dossier of all these cases for thorough investigation by the appropriate agencies.

I have been asking you to come clean on some specific NPAs as listed below:

  1. Brainer Impex Private Limited together with MBPY Exim Private Limited: Rs.130.15 crore (became dead in four months – Maleychandra Madhavchandra Biaswas – the promoter is a relative of top politician of that time as is told by you from time to time for reasons best known to you)
  2. Pratibha Logistics Private Limited: Rs.52.00 crore
  3. Pratibha Shipping Limited: Rs.157.51 crore
  4. Euro Multivision Limited: Rs.278.59 crore (became NPA within a year)
  5. Euro Décor Private Limited: Rs.82.63 crore (became NPA within a year)
  6. Euro Ceramics Private Limited: Rs.59.68 crore (became NPA within a year or so)
  7. Euro Merchandise (India) Limited: Rs.32.20 crore (became NPA within a year or so)
  8. Other entities in Euro Group: Rs.445.00 crore as confirmed by Directors Krishnakumar Goyal, Mukund Abhyankar and Milind Kale (same fate as other Euro companies mentioned above)
  9. Kalanikethan Textiles And Jewels Private Limited: Rs.89.30 crore (within  6 to 9 months)
  10. Rosary Education Trust, Pune: Rs.46.50 crore
  11. Noble Exchange Environment Solutions Pune LLP: Rs.31.21 crore (within 2 years)
  12. Graf Laboratories Private Limited: Rs.114.75 crore (within two years or so)
  13. Krishna Structural Steel (India) Limited: Rs.85.00 crore (within a very short time)
  14. Roji – Tasha Stampings Private Limited: Rs.20.00 crore (within a short time)
  15. Sachin Travels Limited: Rs.23.95 crore (within a short time)
  16. TKT Hightek Cast Private Limited, Ahmadabad: Rs.113.94 crore (within 2 years)
  17. Bogus vehicle loans at various Branches: about Rs.25 crore (instant loss)
  18. PBG Mall at Vashi – Sold to ARC at throw away price.
  19. S K Wheels Private Limited: Rs.109.47 crore (within a short time)
  20. Hollywood Academy: Rs.41.39 crore (within a short time)
  21. Dilip Chhabria Design Pvt Ltd: Rs.33.93 crore written off this year out of Rs.47.00 crore sanctioned. (within a short time)
  22. Parshuram Forge Private Limited: Rs.50.15 crore (within a short time)
  23. Country Club Hospitality & Holdings P. Ltd: Rs.60.00 crore (within a short time)
  24. Tricot Impex Private Limited: Rs.30.00 crore (taken over from SBI in October 2015)
  25. Desai Tusharkumar Nanubhai: Rs.27.26 crore
  26. Shri Kankeshwari Agro Pvt Ltd: Rs.32.85 crore (Rs.30.00 crore taken over from Bank of Baroda in October 2015)
  27. Snehadeep Structure Pvt Ltd.: Rs.25.31 crore (within a short time)
  28. Shubhada Tools Industries Private Limited: Rs.22.70 crore (within a short time)
  29. Nectar Prints Private Limited: Rs.20.40 crore (within a short time)
  30. Citrus Resorts Bangaluru Private Limited: Rs.19.93 crore (within a short time)
  31. Little Master Auto Cast Pvt Ltd.: Rs.21.75 crore (within a short time)
  32. Janata International: Rs.18.48 crore (within a short time)
  33. Anoushka Medicare & Diagnostics Pvt Ltd: Rs.18.19 crore (within a short time)
  34. Pandit Automotive Sangli Limited: Rs.16.94 crore (this loan was transferred from SBI in October 2015) – (within one and half  years)
  35. Pandit Automotive Satara Limited: Rs.16.00 crore (this loan was also transferred from SBI in October 2015) – (within one and half years)
  36. Manan Autolink Private Limited: Rs.58.20 crore (within a short time)
  37. Saptasatij Metatech Private Limited: Rs.102.62 crore (within a short time)
  38. Tristar Cars Private Limited: Rs.50.35 crore (This company has satisfied all loans of Tata Capital Finance amounting to Rs.1.58 crore in Match 2016. The Cosmos bank has written off Rs.50.35 crore meekly during FY 2016-17 and 2017-18. The loan was sanctioned in March 2013)
  39. Shakti Bio Science Limited: Rs.42.58 crore (Rs.50.26 crore taken over from Union Bank of India in March 2013 to eventually write off in Cosmos Bank’s books)
  40. Rotoflow Polymers Private Limited: Rs. 49.90 crore (Rs.17.96 crore written off in FY 2017-18, the balance in earlier years. Loan sanctioned in December 2013 onwards.)
  41. K A Malle Pharmaceuticals Limited: Rs.15.23 crore
  42. Duke Corporation Limited: Rs.50.00 crore (The loan was mainly utilized to satisfy loan of Rs.15.00 crore from Export Import Bank of India and Rs.20.00 crore from Citi Bank in July – November 2010 and the rest is the history)
  43. Masscorp Limited: Rs.25.00 crore (within a short time)
  44. Dhanshree Infratech Private Limited: Rs.5.74 crore written off out of Rs.6.80 crore.
  45. Shubh Tex Production Pvt Ltd: Rs.7.90 crore (Rs.3.98 crore w/off this year) – (within a short time)

Besides this, I have also asked you to come clean on foreign travel expenses of Directors, deals with Laco Services where the daughter of Adv. Panchpore, the Director of the Bank has 60% stake, etc. Working of Cosmos Foundation → Cosmos HR & Multi Services Private Limited → Quality HR & Multi Services Private Limited. Unfortunately you have not been forthcoming on any of the issues.

During all my visits to your office where I met you and Krishnakumar Goyal and Mukund Abhyankar, except courtesy tea/coffee and occasional biscuits, I did not get any explanation from you on the direct questions asked.

However, since you are a practicing Chartered Accountant and ably guided, assisted by Mr. Sunil Sabnis, another practicing Chartered Accountant, (since resigned) I draw your attention to the statements made by the Board every year in the annual report that is reproduced hereinbelow for the sake of brevity:

“CREDIT SUPERVISION CELL

Post-disbursement monitoring of large size borrowers and restructured accounts is carried out by your Bank’s Credit Supervision Cell. It is currently headed by Chief General Manager under the active control and guidance of Joint Managing Director.

Monitoring of large loan accounts and restructured accounts is being done regularly by this Cell…..” [Emphasis supplied]

This statement is till FY 2015-16. For the current FY 2016-17, you have replaced the words Joint Managing Director with the words Managing Director as the Jt.MD has been promoted as MD after the resignation of Mr. Vikrant Ponkshe as the MD of the Bank and extremely short term stint of Mr. Srinivas Joshi as Bank’s MD.

The NPAs touched by me elaborately are the classic examples of diversion of funds for purposes otherwise than what was stated while sanctioning the loans, out right loot and scoot and various other issues. Brainer Impex and MBPY Exim are holding out loud and clear how the loot and scoot technique has been successfully deployed by the Directors. This was also resorted to by other scamsters in couple of other cases. In many cases it seems loans were given to the already defaulting borrowers just to get them off the hook of Nationalsed Banks and Private Banks. The chronology of the events is too apparent for any person of ordinary prudence to miss and they definitely raise serious questions touching the honesty and integrity of the Board as well as the Senior Staff.
 
I had been to your Cosmos Towers number of times. First meeting was with Mr. Vikrant Ponkshe. The second meeting was with Dr Mukund Abhyankar at Cosmos Towers where he wanted to discuss only Arhana Family and Rosary School. Even in that one solitary case that Dr Mukund Abhyankar wanted to discuss with me, he could not provide answer to any of my pointed queries and he ultimately started boasting of his connections with RBI Officials and Politicians. It would be quite interesting to see which RBI official and/or which Politician is going to come to his or your rescue when detailed complaint, which is under compilation, is filed before the regulatory bodies and investigating agencies. During my interaction with your Ex-MD Mr. Vikrant Ponkshe, I came to know that the loan proposals never came to him for discussion or appraisal. The last stop for all loan proposals was the Jt. MD, Suhas Gokhale.

At this background, I am sure even you would agree with me that the role of Credit Supervision Cell working under the active control and guidance of Mr. Suhas Gokhale, the repeated lapses in the stated objective of the said Cell need a thorough investigation by the Investigating Agencies.

The repeated, or shall I say deliberate? – failure as demonstrated by the working of Credit Supervision Cell can be explained away by giving two reasons:

  1. Mr. Suhas Gokhale who is controlling and guiding the working of this cell ‘is incompetent’.

  1. Mr. Suhas Gokhale who is controlling and guiding the working of this cell ‘is influenced by some extraneous considerations’.
Now let us examine the first reason, i.e. Competency. Since Mr. Suhas Gokhale is working with the Bank since more than 20 years or so and has been occupying the Chair of Jt. MD for quite a long time, I tend to give him a benefit of doubt as far as his competence is concerned, regardless of lack of information about his formal school/college education.

This leads us to second reason, i.e. being influenced by some extraneous considerations. The repeated failure, lending another clean facility of Rs.23.50 crore even after having an NPA of about Rs.79 crore and ending up with enhanced NPA of about Rs.103 crore, sanctioning fresh loan to associate companies of an already NPA company, diversion of funds, giving loans to defaulters of other banks and taking the write off in our bank’s books, etc. etc. unfortunately loudly point towards this factor.

Now the question is: what are those extraneous considerations? This question assumes serious overtones and connotations particularly when some of the accounts listed above have become NPA within a quarter.

I am sure as a practicing CA, you would appreciate these points. You are the Chairman of a Co-operative Bank. Being a practicing CA, your duty assumes more responsibility towards financial prudence, as well as misfeasance, corruption, fraud, etc.

On one occasion during our meeting in your office in May 2018, you had made a statement in connection with Kalanikethan Textiles & Jewel Private Limited, Hyderabad that you did not know that the said borrower had loan with HDFC Bank, Hyderabad. When I pointed out that the entire takeover of the loan from HDFC Bank as well as additional sanction is well recorded in the Board Resolution No. 237 dated 11/03/2014 and Resolution No. 13 (10/1) dated 20/03/2014, you changed your argument to saying it is the collective responsibility of the Directors and Krishnakumar Goyal in addition said he trusted the wisdom of others! Is it not sheer nonsense that the financial affairs of the bank are managed in such a casual and deceitful manner with no remorse of whatsoever nature? It is a tragedy that the loss arising out of such fraud is sought to be played down by the entire Board as a trivial issue in a most remorseless manner. I therefore call upon you to explain to the shareholders about this hara kiri by the Board jeopardizing the finances of the Bank.

I also call upon you to spell out to the shareholders what steps you are taking to investigate the repeated failure of the ‘Credit Supervision Cell’ that ‘is working under the active control and guidance of Mr. Suhas Gokhale’.

In this context, it is apposite to refer to the Criminal Revision Application No. 170 of 2016, wherein all 13 Directors and the Managing Director of the Bank have stated before the Hon’ble Sessions Court at Pune that:

Directors do not deal with loan proposal applications and documents. It is for Loan Committee to consider it. The Board of Directors only grant sanction.”

This bizarre submission by the entire Board of Directors before the Court of Law is very important for the shareholders to reach to the bottom of NPAs and ensure that delinquent directors and employees are dealt with in accordance with law to make good the loss suffered by the Bank. In order to go to the root cause of NPAs, it is necessary to know about the delegation chart giving exposure-wise limit-wise power to sanction a credit proposal. To the best of my knowledge, the sanctioning authority is accountable for the account turning into NPA and the consequences thereof – both civil and criminal. That is a matter of subsequent post mortem (detailed investigation).

The Board of Directors has set up various sub-committees for governance. These sub-committees essentially comprise of members of the Board of Directors and Senior members of the management like Chief General Managers which are co-opted.

The bank has the following Loan Committees:

  1. Pune Region & Outside Branches Region Loan Committee
  2. Mumbai & Gujarat Region Loan Committee
Kindly explain to the shareholders about:-

i)         The composition of these Loan Committees.
ii)        The Role of these Committees.
iii)       Chart of exposure limit wise delegation of authority from the Board of Directors to the Managing Director, to Chief General Manager, to Branch Manager, etc.
iv)       The powers of these Loan Committees with reference to TOD, dilution of security, release of any guarantor, etc.
v)        Minutes of the Loan Committees who sanctioned the loans to various defaulters so far reported by me as summarized in my letter dated 26/08/2016.
vi)       The basis on which the Directors have sanctioned those loans.
vii)     The names of the Directors who have sanctioned those loans.
viii)    The minutes of the Board of Directors wherein those loans were sanctioned.

The Bank also has the following sub-committees:

  1. Audit Committee
  2. PNPA Monitoring Committee
  3. Fraud Monitoring Committee
  4. Recovery Committee (Pune Region & Outside Branches Region)
  5. Recovery Committee (Mumbai & Gujarat Region)
Kindly explain to the shareholders about:

i)     The composition of these Committees.
ii)    The role of these committees.
iii)   The minutes of the meetings of these Committees where the NPAs, Recovery, Internal Vigilance, Monitoring of Diversion of Funds and Money Laundering in the defaulters’ accounts summarized by me in my letter dated 26/08/2016 are discussed.

The detailed explanation on these lines would help shareholders to understand the roles played by the concerned Directors or Employees and fix the vicarious liability on the concerned personnel relating to dubious and fraud NPAs.

I request the Bank to spell out the remedial action it proposes to initiate against the guilty ones in this regard and not threaten me with another nonsensical letter from one of the panel advocates acting like a stooge of the Board. I can say so because during my meetings with you and Mr. Vikrant Ponkshe, I was given to understand that the nonsensical reply by Adv. Sadanand Kulkarni was at the behest of Adv. Shripad Panchpor, the Director of the Bank with the express approval of the entire Board. However, I refrain from drawing further inferences at this stage so as not to deviate from the subject of this letter. I also request the advocates on the Board as well as Panel of the Bank to read the landmark judgment given by the Bombay HC on 09/12/2016 defining and underlining an Advocate’s role in upholding the law rather than misusing his position and legal knowledge to hoodwink the system. Detailed observations made by the Bombay High Court squarely apply to the wisdom of likes of Adv. Sadanand Kulkarni as displayed in his letter dated 25/07/2016 in response to my questions vide letter dated 31/05/2016 vis-à-vis present state of affairs.

This issue is very relevant to examine the state of affairs of the Bank to decide on the vicarious liabilities of the Directors and other Senior Management Staff of the Bank for financial misfeasance, personal enrichment, criminal breach of trust, corruption/fraud (for example Directors not doing anything in cases where borrowers with political connections have sold the mortgaged property out and out with so many advocates on the Board and their relatives on the Advocate panel prima facie doing nothing or the cases of instant/infant NPAs, diversion of funds), etc. etc.

All these cases do point towards ‘being influenced by extraneous consideration’. And the shareholders of the bank have a right to know what those extraneous considerations are. As you are a Chairman of the Bank and also a practicing CA, you have professional competence to appreciate these points.

I therefore call upon you to elaborate to the shareholders on the steps being initiated by you on each of the cases raised by me in this letter with reference to corresponding detailed letters that are already on your file on the following lines to the shareholders in the AGM scheduled for 02/09/2018:

  1. When was the loan application received?
  2. What is the type of Loan?
  3. Who did the appraisal?
  4. Had you done the background check of the applicants and how was it done?
  5. What are the reasons to neglect the basic and apparent facts that the applicant is already a defaulter of other Banks?
  6. What is the date of loan application and date of sanction?
  7. Who did the scrutiny of securities offered – both primary and collateral?
  8. What was the due diligence done by the Board when it accorded its sanction?
  9. How many Board Members dissented from giving their approval?
  10. What is the date of disbursement?
  11. Who did the post disbursement inspection to ensure funds are used for the purposes for which they were lent?
  12. Why did you fail to notice diversion of funds?
  13. When did the account become NPA and when was it written off in the books of account?
  14. When did you file the recovery suit against the Borrowers and their respective Guarantors? If any?
  15. What is the net worth of the Guarantors accepted by the bank – if at all there are any guarantors?
  16. What is the value of securities attached by the bank?
  17. What is the amount so far recovered by the bank against each case?
  18. Have you fixed responsibility on any Director or Senior Management including the MDs – past and present for repeated negligence as repeated lapses and negligence cannot be called innocent by any stretch of logic?
  19. What was the consideration that forced you to take over dead/weak loans of other banks as listed above and then writing them off in our bank’s accounts thereby eroding the deposits of the public as well as jeopardizing the liquidity of the bank?
I also request you to read out this letter along with detailed letters in each of these cases before the ensuing AGM to be held on 02/09/2018 as integral part of Item No. 2(A) of the Agenda and spell out the action initiated or proposed to be initiated by you with time-bound schedule. This letter is served on you in terms of Note 3 appended to the Notice dated 10/08/2018. Kindly also note that in terms of Note No. 3 to the notice, this requisition is served on you sufficiently in advance.

I must state here that I had also sent you queries to be answered before the shareholders in the previous AGMs in September 2016 and 2017 vide letters dated 26/09/2016 and 12/09/2017 respectively. However, being fanatically loyal to your now well established recalcitrant, disdainful and arrogant behavior, you chose to ignore the same.

However, kindly note that your failure this time to read out this letter and explain to the shareholders first about the emergence of such dubious/fraud NPAs and bought out NPAs and then the action taken or to be taken would constitute a serious offence as you would be hiding vital information from the shareholders and their decision on adoption of accounts would not be an ‘informed’ decision and can be viewed as obtained through deceit and misrepresentation and/or misinformation. The lapse would be reported to the appropriate forum and would be dealt with decisively in accordance with law of land at your risk as to the cost and consequences thereof. This would also put the sanctity of the AGM in jeopardy, which you please note. And in any case, kindly be loudly informed that adoption of accounts by the shareholders does not absolve the Board of criminal liability in respect of the dubious/fraud loans and NPAs.

This requisition is being sent to you by e-mail, which is legally accepted mode of communication when sent to the official e-mail id of the recipient as held by various High Courts and Apex Court in number of cases.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully

Kishor Satwick

CC:
  1. Mr Suhas Gokhale, MD: E-mail: suhas.gokhale@cosmosbank.in
  2. Dr Mukund Abhyankar, Gr. Chairman: E-mail: mukund.abhyankar@cosmosbank.in
  3. Mr Krishnakumar Goyal, Director: E-mail: krishnakumar.goyal@cosmosbank.in

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Thuggery at Cosmos Bank (25/08/2018)



KALANIKETHAN TEXTILES AND JEWELS PRIVATE LIMITED
CIN: U18101TG2003PTC041238

This borrower is based in Hyderabad. The loan of Rs.89.30 crore was sanctioned by the Cosmos Bank on 22/03/2014.

The Company had earlier borrowed from HDFC bank and State Bank of India. The entire loan had become sticky and on the verge of becoming NPA. The borrower could not have defended a professional set up like HDFC Bank. The borrower company therefore shifted its attention to more pliable and thoroughly corrupt Cosmos Co-operative Bank Limited.

The borrowing from HDFC Bank was Rs.48.50 crore.

The borrower applied for the loan facility of Rs.89.30 crore on 18/01/2014. Like in many other fraud cases, the loan was quickly sanctioned within 2 months vide Board Resolution No. 237 dated 11/03/2014 and Resolution No. 13 (10/1) dated 20/03/2014.

The breakup of Rs.89.30 crore is as follows:

Sr.No.
Type of Loan
Amount in INR crore
Security
1
Cash Credit (Takeover and Enhancement)
56.00
Hypothecation of Current assets
2
Term Loan (Takeover from HDFC Bank)
9.15
Hypothecation of furniture and equipment.
3
Term Loan (Takeover form HDFC Bank)
3.15
Hypothecation of furniture and equipment.
4
Term Loan (New)
21.00
Hypothecation of furniture and equipment.

Note:

  •         Cash credit of Rs.56.00 crore consisted of takeover of Rs.35 crore from HDFC Bank and enhanced credit of Rs.21.00 crore.
  • Term Loan of Rs.9.15 crore was the takeover of the HDFC Bank Term Loan.
  • Term Loan of Rs.9.15 crore was the takeover of the HDFC Bank Term Loan.
  • Term Loan New of Rs.21.00 crore was for the purpose of reimbursement of capital expenditure in respect of 21 stores at the rate of Rs.1.00 crore per store…!!! This is clearly stated in the sanction letter dated 22/03/2014.

It is an undisputed fact that the Cosmos Bank had not only taken over an extremely weak or perhaps NP account from HDFC Bank but also gave enhanced loans to it. This is happening when the Risk Analysis & Strategy Expert Mr. Vikrant Ponkshe was the MD of the Bank. One is left wondering what risk analysis he would have done to sanction such a loan!!

Rs. 21 crore were given as reimbursement of capital expenditure to the extent of Rs. 1 crore per outlet…!!?

What type of expenditure would constitute capital expenditure for an outlet of a borrower dealing in textiles and jewelry? Except furniture and electrical fittings, flooring nothing can be envisaged with the wildest of imagination. The resale of value of such expenditure is absolute Zero. The highly qualified risk analyst Mr. Vikrant Ponkshe failed to notice this and the Directors who were CAs and Advocates also merrily ignored this. The absolute fraud is thus too apparent to be missed by anyone.

Cosmos Bank not only took over Rs.48.50 crore from HDFC Bank Limited but also gave fresh loans of Rs.40.80 crore to this Company.

This Company, like Kingfisher Airlines, has valued its trademark “Kalanikethan” at Rs.25.00 crore and has also created fresh charge over it. And the charge is created and registered in favour of Mr. Juturu Sudhakar in consideration of he extending the guarantee to Cosmos Bank.

The guarantors of the above loans are:

Directors: Mr. V Leela Kumar, Mrs. V Laxmi Sarada, Mr. G Raju Krishna and Mr. Srinivas Legisetty.

Other Guarantors: Mr. Juturu Venkateshwara Ravi Prasad, Mr. Juturu Gopala, Mr. Juturu Bhaskar, Mr. Juturu Sudhakar, Mr. G Narayan Das, Mr. N Siva Kumar and Mr. Natarajan.

The list is quite formidable. But the value of the collateral offered is not at all formidable – it has turned out to be not even peanut. The collateral security offered as per the information from the staff members is not worth even 5% of the loan extended. The account became NPA within 12 months or so. Rs.89.30 is a dead loss. This is not at all prudent banking by any stretch of imagination. This is clearly another fraud pulled by the unscrupulous elements in connivance with the Board. The Directors are sitting quiet as if nothing has happened. On my persistence, Mr. Krishnakumar Goyal and Milind Kale admitted that recovery, if any, cannot be more than 5%.

I may mention here that Mr. Vishwas Aagale, the Hyderabad Branch Manager of the Bank was in police custody or in hiding probably in this connection. However, Mr. Suhas Gokhale, the then Jt. MD and current Accidental MD had gone to Hyderabad personally to release him on bail.

The fact that Mr. Vishwas Aagale is still in service serves as an abundant evidence of the complicity of the Board in this fraud on depositors’ money.

The incompetence and or connivance of the RBI Inspectors and the Statutory Auditors cannot be ruled out as none of them has raised red flag and reported the matter.

The Inside Attack on the Bank going on since ages with impunity is really a matter of grave concern and reflects badly on the the Regulatory Bodies and Statutory Auditors.